No. 230

Look at me, I just can't get away from blogger-but is that a bad thing.

Ok, so there's been a few things I wanna air out like my dirty laundry. That didn't sound right, strike that your honor.

First off, does having 50 pairs of shoes make me bad, at first it was 49, but then I got another pair. Also, these 50 pairs aren't including flip flops and house shoes i.e. slippers for going to sleep and walking around the house. I don't know, because for the past year in college, i've only worn like 4 pairs, does that make me a bad person? Does that mean i'm depleting the world of the materials used to make shoes? Why are shoes so cheap, do I need to start buying Choos or something so I don't spend mucho on shoes-even though I enjoy comfort over nasty feet after wearing them because they hurt like a fresh tatoo. Speaking of tatoos, it's true that Brit got this tat that she tought meant something, but meant something else. Ok, so you would think it doesn't happen to be or happens to stupid people, um Brit, what were you thinking? I haven't even counted how many jackets I have, and I never will, for fear of feeling bad.

Ok, so i'm just stalking people's journals, no, i'm just reading them to get a heads up on their life. I read this one community where this girl says that the girls who wear the Tiffany's braclets and necklaces-the logo ones are trying to be prestigious, but never are and it's the only thing they can buy. Um, so does that make me one of "those" girls. Frankly, I think not, maybe because I don't sport my set every single fucking day like some girls I know-it's just a question, don't they ever get bored of it. Secondly, I own a lot of Tiffany's jewelry, not a light, but in total, i've probably bought like 10 pieces for myself and given them to friends. Yes, like P. Puff Homie says, "my guest drink and eat what I drink and eat." Ok, so when he said it, it sounded cooler, but yea, I mean, hey, my friends and fam rock the same Tiffany's as I do. I personally tought about engraving the tag braclet for my future daughter who one day would keep it as a namesake. I've often worn the chain and not shown the tag on my necklace, but Tiffany's is just so timeless, yes somewhat Waspy and all that as some of the girls are sporting-which pisses me off, but then again, they look cheesier then I do. It's just like those girls with the faux LV Muramaki bags who think they're hot shit. Yea, right. I also pair my accessories with a nice watch, not some little slinky faux silver crap. I must say it looks odd when A. very shiny Tiff's stuff, then lack lustre silver rings and such.

Also, huge debate about the badness of Vogue. This one sucks bad, it's like, only Vogue can make Victoria and that Beckham guy look ultra suave and cheesy at the same time when he has a cast on his arm and they joux up his sleeve. Dear god, and they're like-we're hot, i'm thinking, ok, you're not. This month's vogue is horrendous, dear god, it has nothing in it, just an article about Issac again-they had one a long time ago too, and InStyle beat them to the Issac matter. Also, I realized that W is a great mag as is Vanity Fair. W is just like wow, out there, their images are so strong and so saying you can't ever wear that, but you secretly wished you could type deal. It's amazing not to mention that the pages are huge and I was thinking, great wrapping paper as well as framing something in my dorm because I really don't like that whole poster motif. It's like people, I'd rather see a framed cute little card i.e. quaint and kitschy then some poster of orcas. Although, I have yet to read my magazines, dating back way back, but Vanity Fair always get me-it's their cover, and their copy isn't bad either. But it's all about the cover, and frankly I don't like Nicole on Vogue-so it really doesn't do it for me. She's just not what's happening, like I rather see pale Christina on Vogue the Nicole. She just freaks me out-she's trying to be someone she's not. Christina looks good if you just take away the fact that she's a singer and did all that stuff, if you just look at her image, it's totally revolving in that picture-it's what the new Versace will be like-not that i'd wear it, not my style, but I mean, I can see the vision, yes paleness is not J. Lo's cup of coffee, but Christina looks real, she's embodies the image. While Jennifer does not. You see her, and her attitude comes out like a girl from the Bronx and if that's what Louis wants then that what he gets. Also, what's with her body, the whole butt portion is so not normal looking and did we all see those cheekbones, seriously, it's not fashion, she just looks like a disgruntled 6 train sitting Bronx girl that got her hands on faux Louis. Also, it's like whoever made that page did a horrid job, when they cut it in half, you can't see the bags, just her ass is like full on that guys back and some guy falling back is carrying some dinky bag. Seriously, like i'd be better if she was walking down the street a la that J.Lo LL Cool J vid with black on carrying the thing and as she walks up, some guy fully punked fashioned out slams into her and she uses the bag to hit and run. That'd be like what Louis is emboding, but now, it's just J.Loandherass holding a bag that you know she doesn't sport because she likes Gucci anyways. WOW, tangent. Must go prep for Will & Grace. I think i've gotten funnier-my friends and blogger have helped me a lot.